Hales

Tri Tool, Inc. v. Hales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20232:22-cv-01515California7,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRI TOOL, INC., No. 22-cv-01515-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

THAD HALES, et al., ENERPAC TOOL GROUP CORP.’S MOTION

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 10) 16 This matter is before the court on the motion to dismiss certain claims filed by defendant Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (“Enerpac”) on October 10, 2022. (Doc. No. 10.) On November 7, 2022, the pending motion was taken under submission on the papers. (Doc. No. 15.) For the reasons explained below, defendant Enerpac’s motion to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part, with leave to amend. BACKGROUND On August 29, 2022, plaintiff Tri Tool, Inc. (“Tri Tool”), a company that designs high performance machine tools, filed the complaint initiating this trade secrets action against two of its former employees (defendants Thad Hales and Mike Bracikowski) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.