Zimmer
Jackson v. Zimmer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL DEREK JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01223-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDER1
CYNTHIA ZIMMER, VELDA MURILLO, and DARRELL WORTHY, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendants.
17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and timely comply with this Court’s order. I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jackson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis filed a civil complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). The Complaint challenges Plaintiff’s conviction and sentence in Kern County Superior Court. (Id. at 5, 7-8). As relief, Plaintiff requests “a collateral review” of his conviction, a new trial, or a finding that he is “actually…