Zimmer

Jackson v. Zimmer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20231:23-cv-01223California1,819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL DEREK JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01223-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDER1

CYNTHIA ZIMMER, VELDA MURILLO, and DARRELL WORTHY, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendants.

17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and timely comply with this Court’s order. I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jackson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis filed a civil complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). The Complaint challenges Plaintiff’s conviction and sentence in Kern County Superior Court. (Id. at 5, 7-8). As relief, Plaintiff requests “a collateral review” of his conviction, a new trial, or a finding that he is “actually…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.