(PS) Anenson v. Vacaville Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20232:20-cv-00901California958 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN ANENSON; SARAH ANENSON; No. 2:20-cv-0901 DJC DB PS and CHRISTIAN ANENSON, 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VACAVILLE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 16 Defendants, 18 Plaintiffs Ryan Anenson, Sarah Anenson, and Christian Anenson are Proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 20, 2023, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). (ECF No. 96.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiffs were to file an opposition or a statement of non- opposition to defendants’ motion not less “than fourteen (14) days after the motion was filed.” Plaintiffs, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. //// Accordingly, on August 29, 2023,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.