Hall

(PC) Randolph v. Hall

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20231:20-cv-01434California770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLIN M. RANDOLPH, Case No. 1:20-cv-01434-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER DENYING

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

HALL, et al., (Doc. 31) Defendants.

16 Colin M. Randolph seeks to hold Defendants liable for violations of his civil right pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Introduction On October 11, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel. (Doc. 28.) On October 23, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Opposition to Order Denying Plaintiff Request for Appointment of Counsel for Cause….” (Doc. 31.) Plaintiff contends he “has demonstrated with particularity that (D) have circulated false official documents, doctored records and have submitted perjuried [sic] declarations.” (Id.) Plaintiff asserts he “can not contend with these measures because of his lack of legal prowess…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.