Albornoz

Albornoz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20231:22-cv-01229California2,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSICA E. ALBORNOZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-01229-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER RE AMENDED SCHEDULING v. ORDER

WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al, (Docs. 65, 66)

Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is the request of Defendants Wal-Mar Associates, Inc. and Wal- Mart Inc. (Defendants) to modify the operative scheduling order and extend remaining expert discovery, motion filing and trial dates by approximately 90 days. (Docs. 65, 66). Plaintiff Jessica E. Albornoz (“Plaintiff”) opposes Defendants’ request to the extent of extending trial dates. (Doc. 65 at 5). As the parties are familiar with the factual background and procedural posture of the case from the Court’s prior orders addressing the parties’ discovery disputes and requests to amend the scheduling order (e.g., Docs. 40, 42, 47, 60), the Court references below only those facts essential to Defendants’ pending request. Defendants’ Request 25 On August 21, 2023, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.