Ikegbu

(PC) Cortinas v. Ikegbu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20232:23-cv-00285California1,926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, No. 2:23-cv-00285-TLN-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

N. IKEGBU, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint for screening. I. Screening Requirement As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.