Saxton

United States v. Saxton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20231:20-cv-01278California142 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 1:20-CV-01278-ADA -SKO

Petitioner, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE

THE CASE

ERNESTINA M. SAXTON, M.D., (Doc. 72) 15 Respondent. 16

17 On October 30, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. 72). In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: November 1, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26 27 28