CDCR

(PC) Henderson v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20232:23-cv-01598California845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOMMY BERNARD HENDERSON, Case No. 2:23-cv-01598-JDP (PC)

JR.,

ORDER Plaintiff, 13 v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants.

18 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this case against defendants under section 1983 for violation of his civil rights, under the Rehrabilitation Act, and under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”). ECF No. 1 at 3-5. His claims, as articulated, are non-cognizable. I will give him leave to amend. Additionally, I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2.

27 28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.