Maroun
(PC) Potter v. Maroun
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ONIS CARRABINE POTTER, Case No. 2:23-cv-02162-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER MAROUN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate, brings this § 1983 action against four prosecutors at the 18 Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office. ECF No. 1. The allegations in the complaint are 19 insufficient to proceed. I will give plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint before 20 recommending that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis 21 makes the required showing and will be granted. 22 Screening and Pleading Requirements 23 A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed 24 in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must identify any cognizable claims and 25 dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon 26 which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such 27 relief. Id.…