Rojas

(PC) Dekharn v. Rojas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20232:23-cv-00706California3,307 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMSON DEKHARN, No. 2:23-cv-00706 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. ROJAS, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, an inmate at Folsom State Prison, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant 19 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint filed on April 17, 2023 (ECF No. 1), is before the 20 court for screening. For the reasons set forth below, the complaint’s allegations fail to state a 21 claim. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days after service of this 22 order.

I. In Forma Pauperis

24 Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff’s declaration makes 25 the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion is granted. 26 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 27 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.