(PS) Miller v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALAN MILLER, No. 2:22-cv-02113 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER and TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AGENCY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and the case was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). This case is brought pursuant to the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact, P.L. 96-551, 94 Stat. 3233 (“Compact”) and, as an action for review on the administrative record, is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and Local Rule 261. The parties filed the required cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF No. 28 (plaintiff’s motion); ECF No. 35 (defendant’s motion). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion be DENIED, defendant’s motion be GRANTED, that judgment be entered for defendant and the case be closed. Plaintiff also moves to supplement the administrative record. ECF No. 29. Defendant 27 …