Warren

(PC) Corral v. Warren

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20232:18-cv-00024California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL, No. 2:18-cv-0024 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARREN, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 15, 2022, this action was dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. About six months later, on June 28, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion asking that defendants be ordered to pay plaintiff $1,050 pursuant to a settlement agreement. For the reasons which follow, the court recommends that the motion be denied. I. Background On March 14, 2022, the parties participated in a settlement conference and an agreement was reached. It was ordered that a stipulation of dismissal be filed within 90 days. On June 8, 2022, defendants requested an extension of the deadline because plaintiff had not yet provided defendants with information necessary to complete settlement. The court granted an extension until September 8, 2022, to file the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.