(PC) Rojas v. Sacramento County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20232:22-cv-00379California548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT EUGENE ROJAS, No. 2:22-CV-0379-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2023, and August 16, 2023, mail directed to Plaintiff was returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 183(b), any party appearing pro se must file and serve a notice of change of address within 63 days of mail being returned. To date, more than 63 days have elapsed since mail was returned and Plaintiff has not notified the Court of a change of address. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.