Unknown

(HC) Hickman v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20232:22-cv-01825California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN DUANE HICKMAN, No. 2:22-CV-1825-DAD-DMC-P Petitioner,

ORDER

v. UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s request for judicial notice, ECF No. 13. The Court may take judicial notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 of matters of public record. See U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 530 F.3d 883, 894 (9th Cir. 2008). Thus, this Court may take judicial notice of state court records, see Kasey v. Molybdenum Corp. of America, 336 F.2d 560, 563 (9th Cir. 1964), as well as its own records, see Chandler v. U.S., 378 F.2d 906, 909 (9th Cir. 1967). Under Rule 201, the Court may also judicially notice matters which are not subject to dispute because the matter is generally known within the Court’s territorial jurisdiction or can be readily and accurately determined from sources whose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.