(PS) Peccia v. State of CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20232:23-cv-01412California342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF PECCIA, No. 2:23-cv-1412 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

AND REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On August 14, 2023, defendant filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion or respond in any way. On October 13, 2023, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond, nor has he taken any action to prosecute this case. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.