Herr

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRYAN E. RANSOM, No. 2:20-CV-1209-DJC-DMC-P Plaintiff, ORDER v. and HERR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, ECF No. 43. Also before the Court are: (1) Plaintiff’s motion to stay, ECF No. 40; (2) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, ECF No. 46; (3) Plaintiff’s request for judicial notice, ECF No. 50; and (4) Plaintiff’s request for screening, ECF No. 51. For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned finds that Defendants’ motion should be granted and that, as a result, Plaintiff’s motions are rendered moot. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / The PLRA’s “three strikes” provision, found at 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), provides as follows:

…