Lawhorn
(PC) Martinez v. Lawhorn
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-01602-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING
WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY
COURT ORDERS
D. LAWHORN, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
17 On September 29, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 37.) The motion was accompanied by a Rand1 notice, advising Plaintiff of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 37-4.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), Plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was to be filed “not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service of the motion.” Plaintiff has failed to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition and the time to do so has now passed.2 26 1 Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998). 27 2 Plaintiff filed a…