Jones

(PC) Mills v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20231:23-cv-01214California362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS K. MILLS, No. 1:23-cv-01214-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CLAIM

v. (ECF Nos. 12, 13, 14) ZACHERY JONES, et al.

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 25, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that he stated cognizable a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Zachery Jones and Javier Rivera. (ECF No. 12.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On November 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.) Accordingly, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. This action proceed against Defendants Zachery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.