Cooper

(PC) Kern v. Cooper

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20232:23-cv-00618California2,363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES KERN, No. 2:23-cv-0618 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JIM COOPER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was given an opportunity to file an amended complaint after the first amended complaint was screened and found to not state any claims for relief. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint. ECF No. 11. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.