(PC) Thomas v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, No. 2:21-cv-1657 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER L. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se. On December 13, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim. Among other things, the court noted that plaintiff had identified 21 defendants, yet plaintiff failed to point to facts suggesting 19 defendants had participated in a violation of plaintiff’s rights in any actionable way. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint and plaintiff was provided with the following guidance: If plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint, plaintiff must demonstrate how the conditions complained of have resulted in a deprivation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights. See Ellis v. Cassidy, 625 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1980). Also, in his…