(PC) Hill v. Corcoran State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20231:23-cv-00870California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’VAUGHN CORTEZ HILL, Case No. 1:23-cv-0870 JLT EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION

v.

BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

CORCORAN STATE PRISON, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 17) 16 D’Vaughn Cortez Hill seeks to hold Defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim on August 21, 2023. (Doc. 13.) The magistrate judge directed Plaintiff to file any amended complaint within 30 days. (Id. at 1, 8.) In the alternative, Plaintiff was informed he could notify the Court that he wished to stand on the allegations of the complaint, though the magistrate judge would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.