(PC) Hill v. Corcoran State Prison
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 D’VAUGHN CORTEZ HILL, Case No. 1:23-cv-0870 JLT EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THIS ACTION
v.
BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
CORCORAN STATE PRISON, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT
ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Defendants. (Doc. 17) 16 D’Vaughn Cortez Hill seeks to hold Defendants liable for violations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim on August 21, 2023. (Doc. 13.) The magistrate judge directed Plaintiff to file any amended complaint within 30 days. (Id. at 1, 8.) In the alternative, Plaintiff was informed he could notify the Court that he wished to stand on the allegations of the complaint, though the magistrate judge would…