Warden
(HC) Armendariz-Rascon v. Warden
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20232:23-cv-00576California482 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ARMENDARIZ-RASCON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00576-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS MATTER WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED
Respondent. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDERS ECF No. 9 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
19 20 On August 16, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 9. On October 4, 2023, after petitioner failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty- one days, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 10. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action, he must, within twenty-one days, file an…