Warden

(HC) Armendariz-Rascon v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20232:23-cv-00576California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ARMENDARIZ-RASCON, Case No. 2:23-cv-00576-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS MATTER WARDEN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED

Respondent. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDERS ECF No. 9 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 20 On August 16, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 9. On October 4, 2023, after petitioner failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty- one days, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 10. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action, he must, within twenty-one days, file an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.