Haros

(PC) Thomas v. Haros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20231:23-cv-00452California1,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRENTICE RAY THOMAS, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00452 SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PAUL HAROS, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 Plaintiff Prentice Ray Thomas is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On October 11, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 13.) The Court found Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 4- 11.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the Court’s order. (Id. at 11.) Plaintiff was ordered to either file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.