Scottini

(PC) Robinson v. Scottini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20232:22-cv-01641California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVAUGHN K. ROBINSON, No. 2:22-cv-1641 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTTINI, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is pending. In opposition to the motion, defendant provided the declaration of nonparty R. Hart, an investigator with the Investigative Services Unit at California State Prison. Officer Hart investigated plaintiff’s Prison Rape Elimination Act (“PREA”) allegations against defendant and provided a declaration as to his review of video from both June 7, 2022, and June 8, 2022. However, defendant did not provide a copy of the video for the court’s review. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, defendant shall provide a copy of the video footage reviewed by Officer Hart. Moreover, because such video is highly relevant to plaintiff’s claims herein and plaintiff is entitled to view such video,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.