Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20231:21-cv-00327California1,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTIN HARDY, No. 1:21-cv-00327-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

R. MORENO, et al., (ECF No. 72) Defendants. 16 I. Background Plaintiff Kristin Hardy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 25, 2022, the Magistrate Judge denied Plaintiff’s motion to hold Defendant D. Ceballos in contempt for failing to respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 71.) In that order, the Magistrate Judge noted that Defendant Ceballos’ failure to respond had already resulted in an entry of default. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff had demonstrated neither that this sanction was insufficient nor that there were any reasons for the Magistrate Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.