Walker

(PC) Walker v. Walker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20232:23-cv-01919California2,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN WALKER also known as EL No. 2:23-cv-1919 AC

DEY BEY SHABAZZ ALI,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JACQUELINE WALKER, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 11. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The undersigned rejected plaintiff’s initial complaint and First Amended Complaint pursuant to the screening process associated with in forma pauperis status, and granted plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. ECF Nos. 3, 11. Plaintiff filed a new Amended Complaint, which he also titled a First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 28. This complaint is now before the undersigned for screening. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.