Puckett
Puckett v. Dyer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PUCKETT, Case No. 1:22-cv-750-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS DEFENDANTS AND CASE
v. UNDER FED. R. CIV. P 4(m) JERRY DYER, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the case be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to effectuate service upon Defendants. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Joseph Puckett, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on June 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff paid the filing fee on July 26, 2022. The Complaint names the following defendants: (1) Jerry Dyer, Chief of Police, (2) Paco Balderrama, (3) Judge Kapitan, (4) Fresno City Counsel, (5) S. Calvert, Badge No. 1624, (6) P. Little, Badge No. 9595, (7)G. Gardner, Badge No. 1614,…