Puckett

Puckett v. Dyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20231:22-cv-00750California1,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PUCKETT, Case No. 1:22-cv-750-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS DEFENDANTS AND CASE

v. UNDER FED. R. CIV. P 4(m) JERRY DYER, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the case be dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to effectuate service upon Defendants. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Joseph Puckett, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on June 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff paid the filing fee on July 26, 2022. The Complaint names the following defendants: (1) Jerry Dyer, Chief of Police, (2) Paco Balderrama, (3) Judge Kapitan, (4) Fresno City Counsel, (5) S. Calvert, Badge No. 1624, (6) P. Little, Badge No. 9595, (7)G. Gardner, Badge No. 1614,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.