Quezada

Quezada v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20231:20-cv-00959California273 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE MIGUEL QUEZADA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00959-ADA-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 67) 15 16 On November 9, 2023, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 67.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Pursuant to the Court’s order on November 7, 2023, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the settlement, for 180 days after the parties’ November 9, 2023 request for dismissal, or until the settlement amount is paid, whichever is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.