Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20231:21-cv-01461California553 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS

v. (ECF No. 126) C. PFEIFFER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a copy of his deposition transcript, filed November 13, 2023. Plaintiff requests “instructions on how to pay for his deposition transcripts.” (ECF No. 126.) Plaintiff is advised that the Court has no authority to require Defendants to cover the cost of the deposition transcript even if Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Sharpe v. Cryer, No. 119CV00711ADAEPGPC, 2023 WL 3726145, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 30, 2023) (citing see Clemente v. Parciasepe, No. 2:14-CV-0611 KJN P, 2015 WL 6447495, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 23, 2015) (“Defense counsel is correct that defendant is not required to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.