(PC) Singh v. Sacramento County Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20232:23-cv-00237California332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GURPREET SINGH, No. 2:23-cv-0237 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 26, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On August 11, 2023, plaintiff was granted sixty days in which to file objections and his amended complaint. Sixty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations or filed an amended complaint. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.