(PC) Freeman v. Clark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LEROY FREEMAN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00611-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION MODIFYING

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. (Doc. 52) CONALL MCCABE, et al., Defendants. 13 On November 6, 2023, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order for Modifying the Scheduling Order. (Doc. 49). The Court denied the stipulated request as it was not supported by the required attorney declaration(s) (see Doc. 43 at 7), did not establish good cause for the requested extension, and otherwise sought an unworkable modification of the scheduling order. (Doc. 50). On November 9, 2023, the parties filed a renewed Stipulation and Proposed Order for Modifying the Scheduling Order (“Renewed Stipulation”). (Doc. 52). The Renewed Stipulation is supported by declarations from counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendants. (Docs. 52-1, 52-2). In their declarations, counsel for the parties attest that they have encountered unexpected challenges in undertaking discovery. For…