(SS) Romero Bribiesca v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20231:22-cv-01216California5,341 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

13 Plaintiff Jaime Romero Bribiesca (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of 14 the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his 15 application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the 16 “Act”). Doc. 1. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was born on December 1, 2001, and he was 18 years old when he filed his claim for DIB on February 4, 2020. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 21, 30.) In his application, he alleged a disability onset date of May 31, 2006, based on his borderline intellectual functioning and seizure disorder. (AR 21.) He has a high school education but no past relevant work. (AR 25 30.)

28 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. (See Doc. 11.) A. Relevant Evidence of Record2 1. Medical Evidence Plaintiff has a history of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.