Haddad
(PC) Casey v. Haddad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIQUE ZAFIR CASEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00855-ADA-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER
v. (Doc. 23) HADDAD, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Dominique Zafir Casey is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court issued its First Screening order on January 12, 2023, (doc. 19), and found Plaintiff’s complaint failed to allege a cognizable claim against any defendant. (Id. at 5-10.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, curing the deficiencies identified in the order. (Id. at 10-11.) On March 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. 23.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof…