Bissat

Bissat v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20231:21-cv-01649California851 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RASHID BISSAT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01649-JLT-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT

v. C PLO AN IF NE TR IFE FN C TOE A SHN OD WRE CQ AU UI SR EIN WG H Y SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE

CITY OF VISALIA, A CALIFORNIA COURT’S ORDER

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND

CHARTER CITY TEN DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

16 _____________________________________/

17 Procedural Background 18 On November 12, 2021, Plaintiff Rashid Bissat filed the complaint in this action. (Doc. 1.) 19 Defendant City of Visalia filed its answer on March 4, 2022. (Doc. 8.) On December 19, 2022, 20 the Court set a Settlement Conference for May 11, 2023, and issued an “Order re Settlement 21 Conference.” (Docs. 14, 15). The parties were required to submit a confidential settlement 22 statement to the Court no later than fourteen days before the conference date. (Doc. 15 at 2.) The 23 Court did not receive a statement from Plaintiff. 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.