Paca

Washington v. Paca

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20231:23-cv-00673California505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 PERRY KENJI WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-0673 JLT SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. DISMISSING THE ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

MARY L. PACA, et al., COURT’S ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 9) 16 The assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim on August 17, 2023. (Doc. 7.) The magistrate judge gave Plaintiff the following options: to file an amended complaint within 30 days; to file a notice of voluntary dismissal; or to inform the Court that he wished to stand on the allegations of the complaint, though it would be subject to dismissal. (Id. at 10.) The Court informed Plaintiff that if he failed to timely comply with the order, the action would be subject to dismissal. (Id.) After Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s order, the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.