Torres-Boyd
Torres-Boyd v. Thyssenkrupp Supply Chain Services NA, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9
CHRISTIE TORRES-BOYD, No. 2:23-cv-00659-TLN-AC
Plaintiff,
ORDER v.
THYSSENKRUPP SUPPLY CHAIN
SERVICES NA, INC.; ELLIOTT (LNU); and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
18 19 20 21 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Christie Torres-Boyd’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 6.) Defendant Thyssenkrupp Supply Chain Services NA, Inc.1 (“Thyssenkrupp”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a reply (ECF No. 10) and 25
The complaint erroneously identified Thyssenkrupp Supply Chain Services, Inc. Plaintiff subsequently corrected the error. (ECF No. 1 at 28.) 28 Thyssenkrupp filed a sur-reply (ECF No. 12). Defendant Elliott (LNU)3 (“Elliott”) did not file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case concerns the alleged sexual harassment Plaintiff experienced while working for 5 …