Rubio

Rubio v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20231:21-cv-00286California4,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMUNDO VICENTE RUBIO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00286-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY THE

v. SCHEDULING ORDER

CITY OF VISALIA, et al., (ECF Nos. 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64) Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application to modify the scheduling order to extend the deadlines for non-expert discovery, expert disclosure, and supplemental expert disclosure. Having considered the parties’ briefing papers, the declarations and exhibits attached thereto, as well as the Court’s file, the Court denies Plaintiff’s ex parte application. II. BACKGROUND On March 1, 2021, Plaintiff Raymundo Vicente Rubio (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action, asserting multiple federal and state law claims against Defendants City of Visalia, Chief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.