Artz

Artz v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20232:23-cv-01599California3,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER ARTZ, No. 2:23-cv-01599-DJC-DB 11 Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND AND DENYING REQUEST FOR

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & COSTS AND FEES FRAGRANCE, INC., a California 15 corporation; MARIA CHARDONNAY DOE, an individual; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Jennifer Artz brought a case in state court against Defendants Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (“Ulta”); Maria Chardonnay Doe (“Maria Doe”), an individual; and 100 Doe defendants, alleging various violations of California’s whistleblower statute, anti-workplace discrimination laws, and anti-disability discrimination laws, all arising from Plaintiff’s employment with Ulta. Ulta removed the matter to federal court, and Plaintiff seeks to remand the case back to state court, arguing that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.