Artz
Artz v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER ARTZ, No. 2:23-cv-01599-DJC-DB 11 Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
REMAND AND DENYING REQUEST FOR
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & COSTS AND FEES FRAGRANCE, INC., a California 15 corporation; MARIA CHARDONNAY DOE, an individual; and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Jennifer Artz brought a case in state court against Defendants Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (“Ulta”); Maria Chardonnay Doe (“Maria Doe”), an individual; and 100 Doe defendants, alleging various violations of California’s whistleblower statute, anti-workplace discrimination laws, and anti-disability discrimination laws, all arising from Plaintiff’s employment with Ulta. Ulta removed the matter to federal court, and Plaintiff seeks to remand the case back to state court, arguing that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) because…