Balaji

(PC) Carr v. Balaji

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20232:19-cv-00688California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR CARR, No. 2:19-cv-00688-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. BALAJI, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner pursuing a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 28, 2023, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 68. On August 2, 2023, the court ordered petitioner to file an opposition to the motion by October 30, 2023. ECF No. 83. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), an “[o]pposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding party not more than twenty-one (21), days after the date of service of the motion.” Id. A responding party’s failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.