Bola

Gilbert v. Bola

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20231:22-cv-01286California3,072 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, No. 1:22–cv–1286–KJM–KJN Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND ORDER

v.

MAMTA BOLA, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff Darren Gilbert’s (“plaintiff”) motion for default judgment against defendants Mamta Bola and Amarjit Singh (d/b/a Amar Fashion & Grocery Bazaar) (hereinafter “defendants”). (ECF No. 14.) After defendants failed to file an opposition to the motion in accordance with Local Rule 230(c), the motion was submitted on the record and written briefing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons discussed below, the court now recommends that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be GRANTED. /// /// /// 27 1 This motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Local Rule 302(c)(19). I. Background This is a civil rights action filed by plaintiff under Title III of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.