Biden
(HC) Bennett v. Biden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:23-cv-0619 DAD AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER JOE BIDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections to the November 6, 2023 findings and recommendations. ECF No. 11. Objections are currently due by November 27, 2023. The motion also states that petitioner no longer has a copy of the petition, and requests a copy of the docket and reiterates his request for a guardian ad litem. Id. The requests for an extension of time and a copy of the docket will be granted. The court will also provide a copy of the petition as a one-time courtesy. However, the undersigned will once again deny petitioner’s request for a guardian ad litem. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c)(2) provides that “[t]he court must appoint a guardian ad litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an…