Luis
(PC) Medina v. Luis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA, Case No. 1:22-cv-00764-ADA-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO
v. SUBSTITUTE DOE DEFENDANTS AND
ADDENDUM TO MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 34, 36) Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Cesario Medina is a state prisoner appearing pro se in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that ISU officers arrived at his housing unit to 20 interview him regarding a matter related to his criminal case. (ECF No. 1, at 4). During the 21 process of removing him, the officers twisted his arm with force behind his back, which caused a 22 break in his arm that had been surgically repaired and healed. (Id.) The case is now proceeding on 23 Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Doe ISU Officers 1–3, but only those 24 ISU officers who were directly responsible for breaking Plaintiff’s arm. (ECF Nos. 1, 6, 7, & 9). 25 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Substitute Doe Defendants (ECF No.…