Foss

(PC) Farha v. Foss

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20232:20-cv-02206California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAUWAI FARHA, No. 2:20-cv-2206 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER FOSS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff apologizes for the delay in opposing the motion to dismiss but claims the inmate that was helping him transferred to another prison. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.