Castillo
(PC) Lloyd v. Castillo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN JUAN LLOYD, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00683-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff,
THIRD SCREENING ORDER
v. (Doc. 42) D. CASTILLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adrian Juan Lloyd is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Court should dismiss a complaint if it lacks a cognizable legal theory or fails to allege sufficient facts to support a cognizable legal theory. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990).…