Puckett

Puckett v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20232:22-cv-00350California708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et la., Defendants. 17 On September 8, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to compel production of documents. (ECF Nos. 42 & 43.) On October 11, 2023, the undersigned continued the hearing of that motion to December 1, 2023, and extended the deadline for the completion of fact discovery. (ECF No. 46.) On November 10, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to compel depositions. (ECF No. 27.) Both motions are noticed for hearing before the undersigned on December 1, 2023, pursuant to Local Rule 251. On November 16, 2023—the day before the parties’ Joint Statements were due—the parties filed a joint stipulation for order to exceed the undersigned’s Joint Statement page limitation. (ECF No. 48.) In this regard the undersigned’s Standard Information re discovery disputes, available on the court’s web page at 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.