Monterrosa

Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20232:20-cv-01563California6,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEFTALI MONTERROSA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01563-DAD-DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TONN’S

MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY, IN PART,

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., AND STAYING DISCOVERY AS TO

DEFENDANT TONN FOR NINETY DAYS

Defendant. (Doc. No. 69) 16 This matter came before the court on November 7, 2023 for a hearing on defendant Jarrett Tonn’s motion to stay discovery directed at him—specifically to stay his deposition and his deadline to respond to written discovery—until after the California Attorney General completes a related criminal investigation into the fatal police shooting that gave rise to this civil rights action brought by the decedent’s successors-in-interest. (Doc. No. 69.) Attorney John Coyle appeared by video on behalf of plaintiffs Neftali and Nora Monterrosa. Attorney Jacob J. Graham

The court notes that, on February 11, 2021, the court dismissed the claims that were brought in the first amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.