(PC) Cramer v. Employment Development Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20231:23-cv-01361California884 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, No. 1:23-cv-01361-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

OBEY COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO PAY

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT FILING FEE AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE DEPARTMENT, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Matthew B. Cramer (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 15, 2023, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 2.) On September 25, 2023, the Court issued findings and recommendations that recommended Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because he was subject to the three-strikes bar imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $402.00 initial filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Doc. 7.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.