Garg

(PS) Visconte v. Garg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20232:23-cv-00980California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NOHA VISCONTE, No. 2: 2:23-cv-00980-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. SUNIL GARG, et al. Defendants. 16 On May 24, 2023, plaintiff, proceeding without the assistance of counsel, filed the instant action, paid the filing fee, and was given summonses and an initial scheduling order by the Clerk of Court. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4.) On October 13, 2023, the court ordered plaintiff to file a statement with the court indicating the status of service, or any good cause reasons why defendants have not been served pursuant to FRCP 4. (ECF No. 5.) The court served a copy of the order on plaintiff at the address she provided; however on November 2, 2023, the order was returned as undeliverable. Nonetheless, on October 27, 2023, plaintiff filed a response to the 24 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 302(c)(21). 2 On October 20, 2023, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint and on October 27, 2023…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.