Wang

Wang v. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20232:23-cv-01460California828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA WANG, et al., No. 2:23-cv-01460 CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER v. UR JADDOU, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs commenced this action on July 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in the case, including the entry of final judgment. (ECF No. 10.) On October 2, 2023, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, noticing the motion for a December 6, 2023 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 9.) Under the court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was obligated to respond to defendants’ motion no later than fourteen (14) days after the motion was filed; failure to do so “may be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.” E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(c). A review of the docket reveals plaintiffs failed to do so by the deadline. See ECF No. 11 (defendants’ request that the court construe plaintiffs’ failure to oppose the motion as a non-opposition). “Failure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.