(PC)Mize

(PC)Mize v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20231:22-cv-01322California522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 BRANDEN SCOTT MIZE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01322-HBK (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION TO PROCEED IN v. FORMA PAUPERIS AND REASSESSING FULL FILING FEE

D. LLOYD, AYON, and D. HOUBEIN,

(Doc. No. 29) Defendants. 15 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) filed on October 30, 2023. (Doc. No. 29). Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, initiated this action while he was incarcerated. (Doc. No. 1). Although currently released, Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the full amount of the statutory filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). As set forth in the Court’s October 12, 2023 Order, the total amount that remains due towards the $350.00 filing fee is $243.24. (Doc. No. 28 at 3). Due to Plaintiff’s release from custody, there is no inmate trust account from which periodic filing fees may be garnished and forwarded to the Court. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.